<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: should nascar get rid of its past champions provisionnels?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nascararticles.com/nascar-champions/should-nascar-get-rid-of-its-past-champions-provisionnels/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nascararticles.com/nascar-champions/should-nascar-get-rid-of-its-past-champions-provisionnels</link>
	<description>Nascar Articles</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: NLG</title>
		<link>http://www.nascararticles.com/nascar-champions/should-nascar-get-rid-of-its-past-champions-provisionnels/comment-page-1#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>NLG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 12:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nascararticles.com/nascar-champions/should-nascar-get-rid-of-its-past-champions-provisionnels#comment-44</guid>
		<description>No. And having the top 35 cars in owner&#39;s points locked into the race is also good. The cars that run fast during qualifying are not necessarily the ones that&#39;ll run fast during the race. All the teams that are out of the top 35 tune their cars so they can run 2 fast laps but the race trim is completely different.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No. And having the top 35 cars in owner&#39;s points locked into the race is also good. The cars that run fast during qualifying are not necessarily the ones that&#39;ll run fast during the race. All the teams that are out of the top 35 tune their cars so they can run 2 fast laps but the race trim is completely different.<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevo</title>
		<link>http://www.nascararticles.com/nascar-champions/should-nascar-get-rid-of-its-past-champions-provisionnels/comment-page-1#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>kevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 17:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nascararticles.com/nascar-champions/should-nascar-get-rid-of-its-past-champions-provisionnels#comment-43</guid>
		<description>I would hate to see the big names out of a race, but i think it should be the fastest 43 cars every week!&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would hate to see the big names out of a race, but i think it should be the fastest 43 cars every week!<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandy h</title>
		<link>http://www.nascararticles.com/nascar-champions/should-nascar-get-rid-of-its-past-champions-provisionnels/comment-page-1#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>sandy h</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 11:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nascararticles.com/nascar-champions/should-nascar-get-rid-of-its-past-champions-provisionnels#comment-42</guid>
		<description>YES! And they should also do away with that stupid top 35 automatic in bull.  they should all have to race their best to get in and the 43 fastest are in and the rest go home.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YES! And they should also do away with that stupid top 35 automatic in bull.  they should all have to race their best to get in and the 43 fastest are in and the rest go home.<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PAPABILL</title>
		<link>http://www.nascararticles.com/nascar-champions/should-nascar-get-rid-of-its-past-champions-provisionnels/comment-page-1#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>PAPABILL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 18:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nascararticles.com/nascar-champions/should-nascar-get-rid-of-its-past-champions-provisionnels#comment-41</guid>
		<description>They should get rid of all the provisionals and make it the fastest 43 race.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should get rid of all the provisionals and make it the fastest 43 race.<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ace</title>
		<link>http://www.nascararticles.com/nascar-champions/should-nascar-get-rid-of-its-past-champions-provisionnels/comment-page-1#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>ace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 18:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nascararticles.com/nascar-champions/should-nascar-get-rid-of-its-past-champions-provisionnels#comment-40</guid>
		<description>i dont think so. i do like the way they did it this year and set a limit on how many a past champion gets per year. dj has already ran out so now he has to make it on time or points. i think the limit gives a better chance to newcomers who have to qualify on time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont think so. i do like the way they did it this year and set a limit on how many a past champion gets per year. dj has already ran out so now he has to make it on time or points. i think the limit gives a better chance to newcomers who have to qualify on time.<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

